skip to Main Content

I’m working on a humanities writing question and need support to help me underst

Please note that this is just a preview of a school assignment posted on our website by one of our clients. If you need assistance with this question too, please click on the Learn More button at the bottom of the page to get started.

I’m working on a humanities writing question and need support to help me understand better.You must answer the following:1) With reference to any of TWO of the following, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZIJZMS5BUQhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyYjI7zQlaAhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8VXyfcs0l0https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdeHUrL1FEMuse concepts/arguments from any article/presentation covered in the course to critically analyze THREE aspects of/arguments raised within the two videos you choose. To be clear, you should therefore be raising a total of six aspects of/arguments raised (implicitly or explicitly) within the two videos you choose (three for each video). Critical analysis entails connecting concepts clearly to aspects of the documentary/video and raising objections, counter-objections, and attempts at responses to issues/arguments raised by the anticipated counter-objections.Answer one of the following:2a) With reference to “Can the Supply of Natural Resources Really Be Infinite? Yes!,” (i) reformulate the piece into premises and a conclusion. (ii) Elaborate two counter-objections not anticipated/mentioned/covered in the piece itself. (iii) Anticipate two counter-objections to each of the counter-objections you raise in (ii) and, (iv), attempt to then defend the counter-objections raised in (ii) from objections raised in (iii) without merely restating the arguments of (ii) or arguments from the piece itself.2b) With reference to “Why Put a Value on Biodiversity?,” (i) reformulate the piece into premises and a conclusion. (ii) Elaborate two counter-objections not anticipated/mentioned/covered in the piece itself. (iii) Anticipate two counter-objections to each of the counter-objections you raise in (ii) and, (iv), attempt to then defend the counter-objections raised in (ii) from objections raised in (iii) without merely restating the arguments of (ii) or arguments from the piece itself.2c) With reference to “The Concept of ‘Sustainability’,” (i) reformulate the piece into premises and a conclusion. (ii) Elaborate two counter-objections not anticipated/mentioned/covered in the piece itself. (iii) Anticipate two counter-objections to each of the counter-objections you raise in (ii) and, (iv), attempt to then defend the counter-objections raised in (ii) from objections raised in (iii) without merely restating the arguments of (ii) or arguments from the piece itself.2d) With reference to “Sustainability and Sense of Place,” (i) reformulate the piece into premises and a conclusion. (ii) Elaborate two counter-objections not anticipated/mentioned/covered in the piece itself. (iii) Anticipate two counter-objections to each of the counter-objections you raise in (ii) and, (iv), attempt to then defend the counter-objections raised in (ii) from objections raised in (iii) without merely restating the arguments of (ii) or arguments from the piece itself.*Each question is worth 50% of your final Test 3 grade.*The same instructions and grading rubric/suggestions for writing Test 1 and Test 2 are applicable for Test 3.
Requirements: 1 page per answer or one and half

Get Help Today

Struggling with this particular assignment? Learn how our team of professional writers can help you today.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *